« Home | I Found Out Why I'm the Healthiest Person I Know » | More on Campaign Finance Reform » | Can Marquette Be Far Behind? » | The Neverending FMLA Attacks on Alito » | * » | I Heard the Word "Salami" Tonight... » | Diamond Jim Strikes Again » | Beer Review: Leinenkugel's Original » | 12th Circuit? » | Dominique de Villepin Doesn't Care About Black People » 

Wednesday, November 09, 2005 

Profound Legal Statements

Law & Alcoholism discusses appellate advocacy after his moot court competition...
[M]oot court oral argument is really the legal equivalent of porn-star oral sex: flashy and fun to watch, but not going to get a girl screaming your name without the essentials. Real-world oral argument, however, is messy, sometimes smelly, and best when she's got a Brazillian (sic) wax.

It's no "Equal justice under the law" but I like it.

He clarifies...
What I meant to say was that real oral arguments, like real oral sex, aren't viewer-oriented; they're result-oriented. If you can convince the judge that the law and public policy are on your side, it doesn't matter whether you stumble over a word or two.

This is what we call making law fun. Let's all play.

Edit Comment

About me

  • I'm Steve
  • From Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
  • "There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." P.J. O'Rourke
  • E-mail Me
My profile