« Home | Punk Rock Politics » | Split the Ninth » | Jude Trial » | Scalia Speech at Fribourg » | Rumor Monger » | Time is a Factor » | Out to Pasture » | Hail to the Chief » | Another Book Recommendation » | Reworked Rankings » 

Saturday, April 15, 2006 

Year One

Today is Eminent Domain's first birthday. I can't believe that I've been doing this for a year...

I honor of this occasion, here is a link to an entertaining law review article. Here's the abstract...
This Article is as simple and provocative as its title suggests: it explores the legal implications of the word fuck. The intersection of the word fuck and the law is examined in four major areas: First Amendment, broadcast regulation, sexual harassment, and education. The legal implications from the use of fuck vary greatly with the context. To fully understand the legal power of fuck, the nonlegal sources of its power are tapped. Drawing upon the research of etymologists, linguists, lexicographers, psychoanalysts, and other social scientists, the visceral reaction to fuck can be explained by cultural taboo. Fuck is a taboo word. The taboo is so strong that it compels many to engage in self-censorship. This process of silence then enables small segments of the population to manipulate our rights under the guise of reflecting a greater community. Taboo is then institutionalized through law, yet at the same time is in tension with other identifiable legal rights. Understanding this relationship between law and taboo ultimately yields fuck jurisprudence.
Law can be fun too.

Edit Comment

About me

  • I'm Steve
  • From Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
  • "There is only one basic human right, the right to do as you damn well please. And with it comes the only basic human duty, the duty to take the consequences." P.J. O'Rourke
  • E-mail Me
My profile